“From the investment perspective, the key point is that returns are driven by changes on the supply side. A firm's profitability comes under threat when the competitive conditions are deteriorating. The negative phase of the capital cycle is characterized by industry fragmentation and increasing supply. The aim of capital cycle analysis is to spot these developments in advance of the market. New entrants noisily trumpet their arrival in an industry. A rash of IPOs concentrated in a hot sector is a red flag; secondary share issuances another, as are increases in debt.” → Basically, as Sam Zell would say, avoid competition like the plague (he got his start in student housing for college towns)
The big winner cities of Covid, like Austin and PHX, are now suddenly oversupplied and seeing significant drops in rental rates! Inversely, markets like Springfield MA and Rochester NY saw no supply increases and thus their rental rates are increasing now 5-8% (RealPage analytics)
Zell: “Frankly, there’s no substitute for limited competition. You can be a genius, but if there’s a lot of competition, it won’t matter. I’ve spent my career trying to avoid its destructive consequences. Competition skews people’s assessments; as buyers get competitive, the demand for assets inflates pricing, often beyond reason” → aka euphoria or the winner’s curse
“All too often, high returns attract capital, breeding excessive competition and overinvestment. In recent years, for instance, there has been an epic burst of capital spending in the field of resource extraction.” - the winners of today become the losers of tomorrow - they share the story of the boom and bust of the cod market, which was hyped up ever since the 16th century because of its high protein contents and presence in the Boston harbor, but over time they overinvested and suffered from lower prices as technology (food freezing and better fish trawlers) allowed other areas to catch cod, thus increasing supply